N.C. vs T.V.A.
This week in the Charlotte Observer the chairman of the Tennessee Valley Authority, Bill Baxter, responds to North Carolina State Attorney General Roy Cooper’s column and lawsuit against the TVA. Cooper claims that Western North Carolina suffers from being upwind of neighboring TVA utilities in Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee. He cites air pollution as contributing to rising healthcare costs for western North Carolinians and a decline in the regionally vital tourism industry. Cooper writes,
Our analysis shows that TVA is one of the largest contributors to air pollution in North Carolina. In the Eastern U.S., TVA emissions account for almost 900 deaths annually. Coal-fired plants that make electricity are the largest source of air pollution. In just our state the emissions are responsible for more than 15,000 illnesses and hundreds of emergency room visits and deaths each year.Baxter’s response to Cooper’s allegations and lawsuit is informative to say the least. He counters by placing the majority of the blame on North Carolina utilities.
North Carolina utilities now emit more sulfur dioxide than every other state in the southeast except for Georgia, where TVA has no plants. They emit more SO{-2} than utilities in Alabama and Kentucky, where TVA and other utilities have plants, and twice as much as Tennessee, where seven of TVA's plants are located.Baxter continues,
TVA has tried to meet with Mr. Cooper to discuss his concerns, twice. He refused to meet and instead chose litigation over discussion. Now matters will run their course. North Carolina taxpayers and TVA ratepayers will foot the legal bills. Be assured, however, our commitment to clean air continues, and we will continue to reduce emissions even more than we already have.Baxter’s claims about Cooper’s cooperation are disturbing if true. Many in North Carolina see Cooper as a viable gubernatorial candidate in 2008. We can hope his actions are solely altruistic and not a regionally divisive ploy to gain positive press. Baxter concludes his piece with an appeal for regional cooperation, a course that all Southerners should encourage.
The most effective way to improve regional air quality is through regional solutions, such as EPA's 2005 Clean Air Interstate Rule, which requires utilities to reduce both SO{-2} and NOx emissions beyond levels required by North Carolina's Smokestacks Act. TVA is now planning a new emission reduction effort that will cost TVA and its ratepayers, including those in Western North Carolina, $3 billion to $3.5 billion on top of the $5.7 billion we are already spending.TVA pollution is not just a problem for North Carolina. Southern states need to work together to solve common problems. The people, states, and regions affected by TVA have similar interests and problems. The last thing we need is infighting among neighbors, especially if it’s politically motivated.
Filing a unilateral lawsuit against one utility will not make the air cleaner. The actions TVA has taken thus far are what make the air cleaner, and TVA is committed to further reduce those emissions while providing reliable, affordable electricity to the 8.6 million consumers we serve.


2 Comments:
The TVA has fought against all attempts to reduce harmful emissions whether it be national attempts (with the recently adopted CAIR rules proposed by the Bush EPA) or regional attempts (such as with North Carolina's petition with the EPA regarding all utilities in the southeast).
The TVA is not serious about regional approaches. They oppose any attempts that would reduce harmful emissions - - look at the record not the rhetoric.
If the TVA reduced emissions it would have a regional benefit - - they have no need to seek others to join that effort - - if they would be a leader in cleaning up the air, others would follow because the TVA is the largest utility in the country (and the largest polluter). By being a consistent adversary to cleaner air they allow the smaller utilites to do the same. Besides, if Baxter was serious about a regional approach why has TVA never called for such an approach? Why have they not sent letters to the Governors of the region demanding that they seek regional reductions in emissions for all utilities in the south? Why not? Because the TVA does not want to reduce emissions. This argument is a deflection from the real issue - - TVA is the largest polluter in the south, by far. Do not fall for baxter's misdirection with no sincerity.
Baxter's letter is consistent with TVA's historic "we do nothing wrong" approach to everything. Unfortunately for the TVA their record is not so distinguished. The EPA found that TVA plants have routinely violated the Clean Air Act. TVA's legal response? - - the EPA has no authority against the TVA.
The reductions Baxter cites are mainly reductions forced on TVA - - one by regional organizations who sued TVA leading to a consent order causing significant reductions. The second from a petition by northeastern states that led to the Nox Sip Call causing reductions by all utilities in the southeast including TVA.
You should take Baxter's letter for what it is - - propaganda with a lot of misinformation. Follow the facts as they develop in the lawsuit and you and your readers will be able to draw a fair conclusion of the record of the TVA when it comes to balancing their desire to be the largest utility in the country with the health of the residents that live in the region. I predict it will not be as sanguine as Baxter makes it out to be.
NC utilities will be emitting 60-80 per cent less SOx and NOx by 2009 than TVA. TVA customers will reap the benefit of the cleaner air and TVA will still be pointing to data from 1977 - -what a joke.
This calls to mind the suit that the State of Tennesssee (while not at all synonymous with the TVA) filed against Champion Paper (now Blue Rigde Paper) over polution of the Pigeon River. Where was the regional cooperation then?
Indeed, the TVA has been a problem for a long time. Western North Carolina bears the brunt of this polution due to the elevation increase as you cross into NC. The results of the polution are quite evident atop Mt. Mitchell.
Post a Comment
<< Home